From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 1 12:16:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA23393 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA23388 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA14077; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 13:12:36 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199604012012.NAA14077@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: fdisk and partition info To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 13:12:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199603312249.AAA01686@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Apr 1, 96 00:49:29 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I believe that Bad144 processing [...] > ... > > And you will note, I have been arguing long and hard for a devfs > > (since early 1994). > > I've noted. :) > > > You may have missed this because of the suggested change to the > > Bad144 table location to just before the swap area I have made > > previously. > > Nope. I simply didn't care about bad144. Nor do i now. My last ESDI > disk has been thrown out of a window more than a year ago. :) You don't care because you have turned on SCSI error correction. This is the wrong thing to do for a stripe set and/or RAID... in fact, any time when using spindle sync is desirable, since the spared sector will not be at the synchronized location. In these situations media perfection drivers (the class of which Bad144 is a poor member) must be layered on *top* of the raw disk interface, not in place of it. Which is to say, you have yet to encounter this situation except on old drives because you aren't doing anything very complex with new drives -- yet. > This isn't to say that your proposal doesn't have some merit, but it's > up to others to implement it. I would be happy to write the code. It is dependent, at this point, on other peoples code being there as a foundation. Without knowing in advance the shape of the foundation, it's rather irrelevant for me to go into the prefab building business. I would just have to rewrite the code on a moment to moment basis, which is a waste of my time. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.