Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:03:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211201] print/freetype2: update to 2.6.5, replace LCD_FILTERING with V40 code Message-ID: <bug-211201-6497-nnCp0itqZm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-211201-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-211201-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211201 --- Comment #13 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Do you see actual license text (same as Templates/Licenses/GPLv2) or the > following stub? It happens with GPLv2+, LGPL21+, etc. but not with GPLv2, > LGPL21, etc. >=20 > The license: GPLv2+ (GNU General Public License version 2 (or later)) > is standard, please read from the web. >=20 > If you still don't see the issue then ignore LICENSE_FILE_GPLv2+ line. I noticed the same issue with "+" for (L)GPL* licenses. In case of GPLv2+, = it shows the stub, even if LICENSE_FILE_GPLv2+ (or LICENSE_FILE_GPLv2) defined= (in first case, this is addition (+=3D), right?). So, I think, the usage of "+"= is wrong and better to define LICENSE_FILE for it or create another name(s) without arithmetic operators in port's framework, if needed. I also noticed, that you proposed your own version of licenses in comment #= 3. I created slightly different proposal. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211201-6497-nnCp0itqZm>