Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:39:23 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gpgme Makefile pkg-plist patch-gpgme-engine-gpgsm.c Message-ID: <1102790363.50655.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200412111328.iBBDS6Eq056365@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200412111328.iBBDS6Eq056365@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-6SJaCcgcONg/A7kCFnPT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 13:28 +0000, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > lofi 2004-12-11 13:28:06 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > security/gpgme Makefile pkg-plist=20 > Added files: > security/gpgme/files patch-configure=20 > patch-gpgme-engine-gpgsm.c=20 > Log: > Fix dependencies, enable pth-library, respect PTHREAD_LIBS, > fix build on 4.x, bump PORTREVISION, take maintainership. Why enable pth support? FreeBSD shouldn't require this, and it just adds another dependency? I had specifically disabled it for that reason. What about making it optional? Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-6SJaCcgcONg/A7kCFnPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBuz7bb2iPiv4Uz4cRAozKAJ0VG+U4iISQp3xVW8UghI71HPrdEQCcCtT7 r+KVNQWZlGmQT+uAWwmWMCQ= =2wfn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6SJaCcgcONg/A7kCFnPT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1102790363.50655.1.camel>