From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Sep 15 11:47:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA16165 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 11:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hobbes.saturn-tech.com (drussell@drussell.internode.net [198.161.228.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA16157 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 11:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (drussell@localhost) by hobbes.saturn-tech.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with SMTP id MAA01901; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:47:13 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:47:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Doug Russell To: William Maddox cc: Michael Beckmann , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Parity trouble with Asus mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Are you sure these are true parity SIMMs? Some cheap SIMMs use "logic > parity", which just fakes a parity bit for older MBs that require it. > These will not work with ECC, and should be avoided in any case. > Also, you describe these SIMMs as 2 x 32, 8 x 32 and so forth. In > standard nomenclature, the "32" is the width of the SIMM, i.e., 32 bits. > Parity SIMMs are 2 x 36, etc. > > Admittedly, this doesn't explain why the Gigabyte board worked, unless > somehow the ECC was disabled behind your back. It is quite possible that the Gigabyte automatically disables ECC if you don't actually have parity memory installed as an "idiot-proof" type feature. I honestly don't know for sure, though. Later......