Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 13:12:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Graichen <graichen@innominate.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: SOFTUPDATES stability Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906051308250.5155-100000@presto.innominate.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i just would like to know about the state of SOFTUPDATES in -current and in -stable (are there differences ?) for heavy load situations ... is anyone here running SOFTUPDATES in such situations without trouble ? i'm asking because i noticed some problems then high load benchmarking a FreeBSD machine with SOFTUPDATES enabled (ended up in an unusable filesystem) - but i'm not shure if it was due to the SOFTUPDATES or maybe due to other kernel options or the ata driver (but i did not use busmastering ...) so it would be nice if someone could post here or mail me some experiences with SOFTUPDATES in "production" environments (yes i know its labeled alpha :-) t -- graichen@innominate.de innominate GmbH networking people fon: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 web: http://innominate.de pgp: /pgp/tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906051308250.5155-100000>