From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 3 2:48:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from solaris.matti.ee (solaris.matti.ee [194.126.98.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB52D37B95E for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:48:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vallo@matti.ee) Received: from myhakas.matti.ee (myhakas.matti.ee [194.126.114.87]) by solaris.matti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7EE2CE5C; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:48:16 +0200 (EET) Received: by myhakas.matti.ee (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C163A1C581E; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:48:18 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:48:18 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Brad Knowles , FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <20000503114818.B42554@myhakas.matti.ee> Reply-To: vallo@matti.ee References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from drosih@rpi.edu on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:52:11PM -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?AS_Matti_B=C3=BCrootehnika?= Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:52:11PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > If this is an issue for some nntp software, perhaps that port (the > freebsd 'port collection' port...) should build and use the newer > version of db? Would that help whatever issue got you interested > in this? The upcoming INN-2.3.0 port will need newer Berkeley DB for overview database, in case you specifically request support for it. The 3.0.55 version of Berkeley DB compiles out of the box on the -current as I tried it few days ago. But I think the port of 2.7.7 we have already is enough, althought haven't tried it myself. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message