From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 08:53:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A765816A4B3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1D6D43FBF for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q_dolan@yahoo.com.au) Received: from q.onthenet.com.au (HELO ?192.168.100.154?) (q?dolan@203.10.89.214 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2003 15:53:04 -0000 From: Q To: Marc Olzheim In-Reply-To: <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl> References: <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022095754.GA70026@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022144043.GI55642@dan.emsphone.com> <20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031022204200.GC14012@splashground.de> <1066865808.42673.28.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031023112353.GD14012@splashground.de> <1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl> Message-Id: <1066924375.58538.161.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:52:55 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:53:05 -0000 Good point, maybe I should have said "increasing" growth instead of "linear" ;) Seeya...Q On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 23:02, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote: > > I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is > > definitely not O(n). > > Err... How would you define O(n) then ? > > Zlo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"