From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug 27 09:41:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA14349
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.think.com (Mail1.Think.COM [131.239.33.245])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA14344
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Early-Bird.Think.COM (Early-Bird-1.Think.COM [131.239.146.105])
    by mail.think.com (8.7.5/m3) with ESMTP id MAA25424;
    Tue, 27 Aug 1996 12:41:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from compound.Think.COM (fergus-26.dialup.prtel.com [206.10.99.157])
    by Early-Bird.Think.COM (8.7.5/e1) with ESMTP id MAA20487;
    Tue, 27 Aug 1996 12:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.Think.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA12656; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:43:22 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:43:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tony Kimball <alk@think.com>
Message-Id: <199608271643.LAA12656@compound.Think.COM>
To: karl@Mcs.Net
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: UID < 65535?
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Karl Denninger on Mon, 26 August:
[AFS]
: 
: My understanding is that the server-side code is not (and never has been).
: 

Is it well-specified?