From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 20 16:10:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D763F16A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DAA43D46 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so187585rne for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gJYXtqUCIkjBRW1HjCE6WzuFEect8Qrk9C4P0IzgyRPXlnrPq2iAUomQI97+nX2q10h2B3lma9cPlsYB/jRwMOvT/pxSHLpmze610UW2OQ7qXrnpvOpDdtucNhroEN7cnJsKaarM5TWc7zsBeH5xs2MGQdWQxWZF2fzkkOxw5sk= Received: by 10.38.75.59 with SMTP id x59mr1057742rna; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.22 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84dead720504200910441b9108@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:30 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Marcel Moolenaar , freebsd-standards@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050420155407.GA844@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <84dead720504200541539f4c15@mail.gmail.com> <03f22a3c76ac440b97e2179761dfd6fa@xcllnt.net> <20050420155407.GA844@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Subject: Re: Standard type for code pointers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:31 -0000 > Except that intptr_t need only be large enough to hold an=20 > object pointer. This is not necessarily enough to hold a=20 > function pointer. Right. > The only standard types that are guaranteed to be able to hold > a function pointer are other function pointers. Right, but there doesn't seem to be a C99 name for function pointer types. Is 'register_t' guaranteed to be wide enough? --=20 FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy