From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 25 13:47:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87597106564A for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@freebsd.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4817C8FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:47:20 +0000 (UTC) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1PDlK66024944; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:47:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from dhcp-64-102-220-55.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-220-55.cisco.com [64.102.220.55]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1PDlJ2K011017; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:47:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B867F67.50409@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:47:19 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "varga.michal@gmail.com" References: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: marcuscom and www/epiphany-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:47:21 -0000 On 2/25/10 6:18 AM, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: > Hello guys, > > it's been quite some months into the 2.29 development cycle, and there > is still no www/epiphany-extensions on marcuscom to be seen. Is there > something wrong that prevents it from being ported, or it's just an > oversight / lack of manpower? (In that case, I could do it.) As far as I know, it's an oversight. I didn't notice an update. kwm, avl, or ahze may have tried to build it, and ran into problems, but I was not made aware. If you want to do the port, that would be great. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome