From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 2 17:08:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E77316A41F for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (skippyii.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF29743D5F for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:08:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM0011e6ede298.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.28.254.189]) by skippyii.compar.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k02H9U4u020138; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:09:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <00bc01c60fbf$3d7a8e50$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Divacky Roman" References: <005001c60f69$2dfff650$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20060102101157.GA63949@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:09:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Candidates for inclusion in DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:08:14 -0000 > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:53:03AM -0500, Matt Emmerton wrote: > > Just looking through the kernel code, and there are many strong warnings (in > > NOTES, GENERIC and various bits of code) that strongly advise *not* removing > > COMPAT_43 from the kernel config. > > > > In fact, doing so causes lots of things to break, especially the > > Linuxulator. > > > > That said, would COMPAT_43 (and possibly COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and > > COMPAT_FREEBSD5) be good candidates to put in DEFAULTS -- at least on i386? > > I have patch in queue which removes dependancy of linuxator on COMPAT_43 > (hysteria.sk/~neologism/linux43.patch) - its tested on amd64/i386 but havent > tried alpha (not even building it - anyone willing to test this?) > > and I plan to work to split COMPAT_43 into whats necessary for tty stuff and > the rest. after this we can remove COMPAT_43 from even GENERIC imho. That's great news! > I dont think that moving in the direction you suggest is correct. Agreed. In the context of your work, my suggestion is definitely a step in the wrong direction. -- Matt Emmerton