From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 29 18:34:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9613E16A41A for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DD913C4A3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so1304267nfb for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.95.20 with SMTP id s20mr4637769fgb.1193649136797; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.17.9.98? ( [193.136.24.243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v23sm11915900fkd.2007.10.29.02.12.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:12:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <472551FE.3020703@elischer.org> References: <47241E9C.7000605@elischer.org> <472551FE.3020703@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <38C11A33-7BA8-46DF-A9DB-E7677DF41885@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rui Paulo Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:12:09 +0000 To: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: Rui Paulo Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: learned something about coretemp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:34:17 -0000 On 29 Oct 2007, at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 10/28/07, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> never kldload it on an 8 year old system. >>> >>> *bewm* >>> >>> I presume that my 8 YO inspiron 7500 doesn't have whatever is >>> needed, >>> but, "*Bewm*" is probably a less than optimal reaction. >> That has been reported in the past. It's Intel's fault, not ours. >> The spec says that if you issue a CPUID you should be able to tell if >> the CPU has the temperature sensors regardless of the CPU model, but >> on old systems these CPUID call "returns true". > > maybe we should just return true to I'm sorry, but what do you mean? -- Rui Paulo