From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 23:22:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7375416A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (fast.dnswatch.com [216.177.243.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025DB43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (localhost.dnswatch.com [127.0.0.1]) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j3TNMbrt018386; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id j3TNMa1O018385; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fast.dnswatch.com: www set sender to null@dnswatch.com using -f Received: from ns0.1command.com ([216.177.243.38]) (DNSwatch.com_WebMail authenticated user null) by webmail.dnswatch.com with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1240.216.177.243.38.1114816956.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <448y31lpbo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <63349.216.177.243.42.1114575288.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com><44is27m6bd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org><54861.216.177.243.35.1114721730.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com><44zmvi8tl9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org><65221.216.177.243.35.1114728304.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <448y31lpbo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "/dev/null" To: "Lowell Gilbert" User-Agent: DNSwatch.com_WebMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't build kernel [with CONFIG this time] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:22:42 -0000 Thanks! I'll take your advise. -Chris > "/dev/null" writes: > >> Doesn't "make buildworld" run an rm -r(f) to cleanse any previous >> attempts to build world? > > No, it doesn't. It cleans a lot of objects to avoid the limitations > of not knowing whether you need to rebuild based on a new compiler > (rather than a new source file), but it doesn't do anything that > widespread. > >> or did you mean the message I got suggesting a "rm -fr /usr/obj? > > I think that was /usr/obj/*, but yes. > That message came from the guy who manages the FreeBSD ports system, > and unlike me, he virtually never makes guesses on the mailing lists... > //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////