Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:06:44 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <ulrich@pukruppa.net> To: Uwe Laverenz <uwe@laverenz.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem gdm 2.24, xdmcp D-BUS? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901310447120.45696@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <49835D1D.6070504@laverenz.de> References: <be36dc210901300508l4f9ef8e6ta8f454f1513004fd@mail.gmail.com> <be36dc210901300703s10fe7f37y808c265d723ff561@mail.gmail.com> <20090130160750.GA15557@laverenz.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901302020050.45696@pukruppa.net> <49835D1D.6070504@laverenz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Uwe Laverenz wrote: > Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: > >> gdm-2.24.1_5 is not broken, else I couldn't have logged onto my >> gnome-desktop some minutes ago. But there are some feature-regressions > > Sorry, do you mean you logged into a _remote_ machine (via XDMCP) that is > running GDM 2.24 and listens to UDP 177? Because this is the thing that > doesn't work for us. When I said "broken", I meant that XDMCP does not work > anymore (and a few other things that users were comfortable with). Sorry, I didn't catch the original posters second last line, my fault. Xdmcp is not available via gdm-2.24 . Greetings Uli. > >> compared to 2.20 - developers say they have rewritten important parts of >> the code. > > Rewritten? Yes, that's what they call it these days when they remove features > without getting the new stuff working. :-( > > Uwe > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | Wuppertal | Germany
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0901310447120.45696>