From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Jan 25 08:36:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E1C2391A6 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484Tqx200Rz4GdC for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 443802391A5; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FBD2391A4 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 484Tqx17pKz4Gd9 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E0858D8 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00P8aDYO089696 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00P8aDNc089695 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230807] if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networking E2200 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:36:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230807 --- Comment #8 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7) It is working without the patch when the threadripper 1950X ACPI is configured as non-NUMA (via what the old Ryzen Master version calls "distributed" mode). I am no longer actively experimenting with NUMA mode for other purposes, at least for now. So if I just applied the patch and rebuilt and reinstalled, I'd just be testing if it stopped the working context from working. That presumes that I understood what the patch is to be, but I do not. The way I read the forum message, the shown lines of code were already in /usr/src/sys/dev/alc/if_alc.c and a somewhat different pair of lines was to be put somewhere ("with modified if condition"). I've no clue what the modification was nor where the two new lines were to be put. (Knowing the later might help identify the former by giving a context to examine.) Is the patch expected to be NUMA-specific as far as fixing things? Are you asking that I try the patch when the ACPI information is configured for NUMA (called "local" mode in that Ryzen Master)? If yes-and-yes, then I'd first need to somehow identify the specific patch to be made, unless someone that knows reports the specifics that I should use. I have yet to figure this out on my own. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=