From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  7 02:29:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B49FF16A4CE; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 02:29:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2AC8043D1F; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 19:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eta@lclark.edu)
Received: from [192.168.0.103]
	(c-24-21-18-195.client.comcast.net[24.21.18.195])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP
	id <20040607022907012001jn66e>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 02:29:08 +0000
From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
To: Nuno Teixeira <nu@nunotex.freeshell.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040603203616.GC608@nunotex.local>
References: <20040603203616.GC608@nunotex.local>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1086575347.806.129.camel@leguin>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:29:08 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: x11@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Xorg meta-port?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 02:29:13 -0000

On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 13:36, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is is planned to create a meta-port to xorg ports?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Nuno Teixeira

Yes, when we've got the core pieces all in the tree (I include the print
and font servers in there).

For now the next major step is updating imake, because that's blocking
XFree86 4.4 ports (since I was planning on having that be only provided
by xorg).  I'm working on that now.  Actually, I'm going to add it as
devel/imake-6, and make an xorg switch for bsd.port.mk to be tested, so
I can keep my hands as clean of XFree86 as possible and keep kkenn
happy.  I still don't like the idea of having these pieces that are used
by so many ports being interchangable, but it's becoming more ok with
me.

-- 
Eric Anholt                                eta@lclark.edu          
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         anholt@FreeBSD.org