From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 2 16:25:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F823FED for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBDA2F51 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n10so429879qcw.2 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6MW2wf2r0K77NJbNQzzp1VX1h/uH/dS3nRngEy251UE=; b=j+f0u59qTkNhr7gkCtJZTIrbcNc3CMI0vKh6sI/0AP7IK2rmmP/wO/ACP7jmD6yg3G BZTpitnlr9wbzTfb5BdKuL0uVZQezIGDGPmsqwy1dkPvW4+iFugo7XS6JSbCQQhsytA7 OEDv6bqAQ1VX5gT9YudjOjrCgShl9lFMDQY3tEYUs9M3onKjEQqZSQdubSjYi53ue04l L2/m3hzGqu3oUwVPEey2nFvxhls4UcGF7CdmmZf1d0wEeBhUdF7K/BBTSJQOtBRBL0E1 Z321OlaI/ogINZqSvo+0qFcyPMiJ94kDEzJw+LPn5+MTvUsb11Cd/aRu0T5aqFtxS0zR UbiQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.3.197 with SMTP id 5mr1078422qao.25.1375460705547; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.78.194 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51FBC806.3070500@egr.msu.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:25:05 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS: unsupported ZFS version 5000 (should be 28) From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Tim Gustafson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Tom Evans , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 16:25:06 -0000 On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: >>> http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.2 >>> http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4 >>> http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 > >> No, those are release engineering branches - which receive updates - >> rather than release tags. The release tags are of this sort of >> variety: > > Sorry, I think I was using incorrect labels. The bottom line is: are > the "releng" branches the ones that I should be tracking for > production servers, or should I stick to "release"? Is it correct > that if I stick to "release", I won't get any post-release updates at > all? > > -- > > Tim Gustafson > tjg@ucsc.edu > 831-459-5354 > Baskin Engineering, Room 313A > _______________________________________________ Tracking release/x.y branches is incorrect because they are frozen in time snapshots that are never updated. Use the releng/x.y branches for production systems to get errata and security fixes. -Kimmo