From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 5 17:53:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA16074 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 17:53:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zip.io.org (root@zip.io.org [198.133.36.80]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA16069 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 17:53:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from taob@localhost) by zip.io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA22723; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:56:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:56:17 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: Jon Loeliger cc: Joe Greco , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest 2.1R panic. Hmm. In-Reply-To: <199602282134.PAA07301@chrome.jdl.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Feb 1996, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > And, on the other hand, it's kinda cool NOT to too: > > This is command 8464 in one window: > chrome 8464 % ps auxwww | grep bin/emacs > jdl 405 0.0 9.8 5956 1380 v0 SN 4Feb96 29:03.22 /usr/ > local/bin/emacs -display :0 -geometry 80x50+675+0 -f server-start What sort of limits might we be running into with long-lived processes? The oldest one I have on our machines is our IRC server: # date Tue Mar 5 19:53:52 EST 1996 # ps aux | head -2 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND andrew 6069 1.7 26.9 18268 17068 ?? SN 7Feb96 2834:23.83 /usr/ircd/ircd I imagine the CPU time will eventually wrap around, but other than that, the other bits of information should remain valid indefinitely. That's almost 2 days' worth of CPU time. :) -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org) Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"