From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 13 14:01:06 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE1C99BF73
 for <freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from info@toco-domains.de)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3503CDD
 for <freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from info@toco-domains.de)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 6524A99BF66; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6481799BF63
 for <ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from info@toco-domains.de)
Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C594C9A;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from info@toco-domains.de)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170])
 by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 013681B2283F;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:01:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55A3C49C.6060909@toco-domains.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:01:00 +0200
From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <info@toco-domains.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Moll <mmoll@FreeBSD.org>
CC: ruby@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Gitlab] Call for help / ideas
References: <55A2A5E8.9070703@toco-domains.de>
 <20150712203531.GA98073@darkthrone.kvedulv.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150712203531.GA98073@darkthrone.kvedulv.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ruby>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:01:06 -0000

Hello,

>> Second: gitlab is based at Rails 4.1.11, while we provide 4.2 in the
>> ports-tree. When using 4.1.x the installation went fine. The behavior of
>> activerecord changed between 4.1 and 4.2.
>
> I'd ask the GitLab people if they're switching to rails 4.2 soon and
> hope for a "yes". While creating rails41 ports is not completely
> impossible, it would be quite a burden and GitLab will need to switch
> to a newer rails in some time anyway.

There is ongoing effort to switch to rails 4.2 since November 2014. I do 
not believe that the will adopt quickly to rails 4.2. :( It seems a big 
problem for many gems they used.

So this will take a while.

Greetings,
Torsten