From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 15 17:15: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28CF15676 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 17:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29653; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 18:13:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA00978; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 18:13:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199907160013.SAA00978@harmony.village.org> To: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: OpenBSD's strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3) Cc: Paul Hart , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jul 1999 01:38:24 +0200." <80530.932081904@axl.noc.iafrica.com> References: <80530.932081904@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 18:13:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <80530.932081904@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sheldon Hearn writes: : If the optional shortfall argument is passed non-zero, the functions Impossible to implement, gratuitously incompatible with OpenBSD. I'd say no. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message