From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 9 13:52:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA44437B86B for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 13:52:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id WAA18745 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 22:52:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA72195 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 21:42:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: cd /usr/src; make update? Date: 9 Mar 2000 21:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: <8a92b5$26fo$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <20000308124502.B26960@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brad Knowles wrote: > typing "make update" [...] and I wouldn't want it to grab > the /usr/ports stuff without my explicitly going in to /usr/ports and > also typing "make update". Yes, this is unexpected and inconsistent. There are already separate update targets in /usr/{ports,doc}/Makefile. If you choose to update your tree by cvs rather than cvsup, "make update" in /usr/src also won't update the ports. I recently nagged about it on -current, but was met there with some resistance and mostly a lack of interest. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message