From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 17:31:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91A317B; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail2.jnielsen.net (webmail2.jnielsen.net [50.114.224.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.jnielsen.net", Issuer "freebsdsolutions.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820D6670; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.1.196] (office.betterlinux.com [199.58.199.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by webmail2.jnielsen.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9H3n3m092523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:03:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail2.jnielsen.net: Host office.betterlinux.com [199.58.199.60] claimed to be [10.10.1.196] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD From: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:03:50 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <981D4579-CBD4-46EF-A4E3-4236B3C06EF2@jnielsen.net> References: <154A442D-7814-4618-9AFC-6F9FB3F5DFD3@gmail.com> <5443A89F.8050801@digiware.nl> To: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: freebsd-current , Neel Natu X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:31:17 -0000 On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox = wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox = >> wrote: >>> I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is = there a >>> timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? >>=20 >> It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame = in >> mind. >>=20 >> I'll guess that it'll be towards the end of November but can be >> accelerated if someone has a need for this in 10-STABLE sooner. >=20 > I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available. On a = friend's > advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and = 32Gig of > RAM. I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my > other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify. Ping? I'm also waiting with bated breath for this to be MFCed. :) Thanks = for the great work! JN