From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Aug 26 22:00:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA10181
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pop01.ny.us.ibm.net ([165.87.194.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA10176
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 22:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by pop01.ny.us.ibm.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id FAA60500; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 05:00:46 GMT
Message-Id: <199608270500.FAA60500@pop01.ny.us.ibm.net>
From: "Francisco Reyes" <reyes01@ibm.net>
To: "FreeBSD questions" <questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 96 00:59:50 -0400
Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" <reyes01@ibm.net>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Francisco Reyes's Registered PMMail 1.52 For OS/2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: How is support for 3com Etherlink (3C509B)? 
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

We just got some ethernet cards at work. They are 3com Etherlink. It
has marked 3C509B. By looking at GENERIC there is  "(buggy)" next to
the 3C509. I wonder if this note refers to the card or the support
for it (ie is the card bad?). I  am also wondering if the "B" is a
newer model of this card and if anyone has tried with with FreeBSD
2.1.5.