Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 02:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New options for lastcomm(1) Message-ID: <199507210926.CAA11990@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199507210636.IAA20706@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jul 21, 95 08:36:38 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > + * > > > + * @(#)lastcomm.c 8.1 (Berkeley) 6/6/93 > > > > Please do not add UCB SCCS ID strings to files that shipped from > > UCB without them, this causes later imports to conflict here if > > CSRG should happen to correct the problem. > > Any other opinions? Anybody objecting against commiting it? I would > otherwise, after fixing minor things (like these SCCSids, and perhaps > spelling problems), but i personally don't run accounting and would > prefer getting opinions of those who do. I did not evaluate any other parts of that diff, as I also do not run accounting (who I am I going to bill, myself :-)), so didn't pay a whole lot of attention to the new functionality, though I probably should have. > The additions would make sense for me. Find someone running accounting to review your ``cleanedup'' diff and I am all for addeded functionality to lastcomm as a 2 mintue read of the current lastcomm man pages shows it to be seriously lacking in functionality of just what data it can produce :-(. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507210926.CAA11990>