From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun May 6 13:34:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE88FBA382; Sun, 6 May 2018 13:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9A775BBF; Sun, 6 May 2018 13:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1fFJnf-000NW9-8n; Sun, 06 May 2018 15:34:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 15:34:03 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Kurt Jaeger , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace Message-ID: <20180506133403.GX25490@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201805061015.w46AF3HQ070595@repo.freebsd.org> <20180506102749.GA58637@FreeBSD.org> <20180506103420.GW25490@fc.opsec.eu> <20180506105012.GA39087@FreeBSD.org> <01010163359962dc-36ee8574-dbd7-4cc6-8032-e04a80a18f1e-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01010163359962dc-36ee8574-dbd7-4cc6-8032-e04a80a18f1e-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 13:34:08 -0000 Hi! > On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > *facepalm*. This poudriere-driven development is more and more disturbing. > > You didn't attempt to understand the problem, you didn't attempt to fix the > > PLIST_FILES (remove bogus %%ETCDIR%% since this is Makefile), you didn't > > ask for a peer review. meta@ pessimized the port, provided wrong commit > > log (it tells *nothing* about poudriere failing with a signal 6 in make > > package, it says "pet portlint"), and you've approved it like there's > > nothing wrong with all of this. :-( > > Sorry about that. I understand what I should have done and I could do. > Then what should I do next? Should I turn back to PLIST_FILES? What should > I do from the next time not to repeat such a folly? Right now it's OK as it is. The pkg bus error needs to be investigated and a problem report should be done that helps the maintainers of pkg(8) to fix the issue. After the cause is fixed, the port can return to PLIST_FILES (if possible). But it's nothing that we should become religious about it, but if it helps danfe's adrenaline pegel... -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !