Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:19:43 -0400 From: Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerrit_K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <483EC98F.20901@jellydonut.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529101620.e7d44cc8.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <483C2C8F.7070909@jellydonut.org> <20080529101620.e7d44cc8.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gerrit Kühn wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:45:19 -0400 Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org> > wrote about Re: broken re(4): > > MP> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit? > > MP> I'm running 6.3 on the exact same Jetway board at home, and while I > MP> haven't been bitten by the DOWN/UP issue I have seen the occasional > MP> "corrupted MAC on input" error when doing an ssh/scp. Seems to have > MP> simmered-down since moving from 6.3-RELEASE to 6.3-STABLE (last > MP> supped/rebuilt on 5/6/08). > > MP> Note this is using only one of the 2 on-board NICs. I disabled the 2nd > MP> one in the BIOS as I don't need it at the moment. > > After my experiences with the patch Pyun provided is seems to me that > running one or two nics makes somehow a difference. > I am still wondering why I have two boards with the same hardware that > work flawlessly. > However, when comparing all things, I found some minor differences: > The working boards are some months older and their CPU shows up like this: > > CPU: VIA C7 Esther+RNG+AES+AES-CTR+SHA1+SHA256+RSA (1500.01-MHz 686-class > CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6a9 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xa7c9baff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x181<SSE3,EST,TM2> > > > The one that doesn't work is newer and dmesg identifies: > > CPU: VIA C7 Processor 1500MHz (1500.01-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6d0 Stepping = 0 > Features=0xa7c9baff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x4181<SSE3,EST,TM2,xTPR> > VIA Padlock Features=0xffcc<RNG,AES,AES-CTR,SHA1,SHA256,RSA> > > > This is the only difference I can make out so far. Which board do you > exactly have? > > > cu > Gerrit > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I've got the newer revision: CPU: VIA Eden Processor 1200MHz (1200.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6d0 Stepping = 0 Features=0xa7c9baff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE> Features2=0x4181<SSE3,EST,TM2,xTPR> VIA Padlock Features=0xffcc<RNG,AES,AES-CTR,SHA1,SHA256,RSA> That's actually why I had to move to 6-STABLE. The CPUID detection routines for the 0x6d0 revision aren't in 6.3-RELEASE. -Proto
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?483EC98F.20901>