From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 23 14:57:46 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A1A1065672
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za)
Received: from inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net (inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net
	[41.161.16.135])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9DE8FC1B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [41.154.88.19] (helo=clue.co.za)
	by inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net with esmtpsa
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ianf@clue.co.za>)
	id 1OnYT2-0004ho-04; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:57:44 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za)
	by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <ianf@clue.co.za>)
	id 1OnYSy-0001e9-Vv; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:57:41 +0200
Message-Id: <E1OnYSy-0001e9-Vv@clue.co.za>
From: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <E1OnY55-0001YZ-0L@clue.co.za> 
References: <E1OnY55-0001YZ-0L@clue.co.za>
	<20100823140149.GG2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<201008230826.49509.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<E1OmUBI-0000Oy-J5@clue.co.za> <E1OnWc7-0001Kv-47@clue.co.za>
	<20100823132551.GE2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20100823133555.GA64651@hoeg.nl>
	<20100823134459.GF2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20100823134723.GC64651@hoeg.nl> 
X-Attribution: BOFH
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:57:40 +0200
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fusefs-kmod broken? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:57:46 -0000

Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> So, in this case is the fusefs module broken?  I'm guessing it is.
> I don't like the way fuse_fileops is initialised in fuse4bsd.  I
> would prefer for the struct to be zeroed and then the fo_xxx
> implimented bits set as appropriate.  That way when the struct is
> changed, you don't get stung again.

I am an idiot - that will have no effect.  This patch needs to be
included in sysutils/fusefs-kmod/files

-- 
Ian Freislich

patch-fuse_module__fuse_main.c
--- fuse_module/fuse_main.c.orig	2010-08-23 16:52:20.000000000 +0200
+++ fuse_module/fuse_main.c	2010-08-23 16:48:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@
 	switch (what) {
 	case MOD_LOAD:                /* kldload */
 
+		fuse_fileops.fo_truncate = vnops.fo_truncate;
 		fuse_fileops.fo_ioctl    = vnops.fo_ioctl;
 		fuse_fileops.fo_poll     = vnops.fo_poll;
 		fuse_fileops.fo_kqfilter = vnops.fo_kqfilter;