From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  9 15:59:46 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 5D4D1CCF; Tue,  9 Oct 2012 15:59:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:59:46 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk
Message-ID: <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org,
 Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:59:46 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:59:46 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:59:46 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:59:46 -0000

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive options.  I
> > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for proper
> > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored.
> > 
> > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project.
> 
> Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist that is
> why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to implement,
> but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of
> freebsd has it.

Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now).  Is it known what's
preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we have
working dialog(1) already?

./danfe