Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:25:34 -0500 From: Aniruddha Bohra <bohra@cs.rutgers.edu> To: kmacy@fsmware.com Cc: Ashok Shrestha <ashok.shrestha@gmail.com>, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n?= C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VMWARE GSX Port? Message-ID: <1141395934.995.4.camel@freebsd-devel> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170603021328m530fdca9h5dde855947370841@mail.gmail.com> References: <79e2026f0602241120u77b4d043jca464a658bb0c0f7@mail.gmail.com> <44008135.1030901@samsco.org> <20060228175317.T19575@odysseus.silby.com> <20060228182139.O30130@thor.farley.org> <79e2026f0603021323h3ede49a6jc55ca816897847e@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170603021328m530fdca9h5dde855947370841@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 13:28 -0800, Kip Macy wrote: > -CURRENT runs on 3.0 as a domU. There is partial dom0 support. The > changes have not gone back into the mainline because xenbus is > extremely difficult to integrate cleanly. You can check on the state > of the xen3 branch in perforce. At several places the "difficulties" are mentioned. Is there some place that these are listed or discussed in more detail? Thanks Aniruddha
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1141395934.995.4.camel>