From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:54:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:54:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from liberty.onthenet.com.au (liberty.OntheNet.com.au [203.22.124.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E3643D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (CPE-30-203.dsl.onthenet.net [203.144.30.203]) j060rxnP062887; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:54:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41DC8D42.6070000@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:58:42 +1000 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Gallatin References: <41D4B6BD.3050705@freebsd.org> <20050101213630.GA3034@flow.eu.org> <20050101223317.GA6970@moof.catpipe.net> <41D75B55.2090502@freebsd.org> <20050102115505.GA28305@moof.catpipe.net> <41D93EFB.5050104@freebsd.org> <16860.2359.646545.119336@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <16860.2359.646545.119336@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPC miniinst.iso available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:54:11 -0000 > > Alpha uses native MBR slices/BSD partitions ala FreeBSD/i386. > > For the boot disk, the alpha uses native BSD partitions just like > Tru64 with no x86 MBR or slices. There are all kinds of restrictions, > like "a" must be root and must be the first partition on the disk. > For non-boot disks, it can use other partitioning schemes, just like > any other FreeBSD platform. Oops, OK. Sounds like sparc64. > What's wrong with just using the native Apple parition table for boot > disks on PPC? Too few available paritions, what with all the driver > and patch partitions? Not really, since you have to re-partition in any case. I thought it might be a bit easier to only create a single extra partition, and then subdivide that in sysinstall. later, Peter.