From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Dec 18 03:06:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA24462 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 03:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA24457 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 03:06:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 7949 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Dec 1998 11:06:20 +0000 (GMT) To: grog@lemis.com Cc: patton@sysnet.net, dswartz@druber.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RAID solutions? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:56:36 +1030" References: <19981218185636.Z486@freebie.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 12:06:20 +0100 Message-ID: <7947.913979180@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > ... and the FreeBSD ccd mirroring does *not* balance the reads. It always > > reads from the first disk in a mirror. > > Correct. But that's about the only package that does. Use vinum > instead; it's much more advanced. We haven't really looked at vinum because we've gotten the impression that it's not quite ready for prime time yet. If you think it can offer stability and write performance similar to ccd, *and* better performance on reads (for a mirrored file system), it's definitely something we should consider. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message