From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Jul 29 15:47:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D729AE21F for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79B11082 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C94581FE022; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:47:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55B8F5EC.2050908@selasky.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:49:00 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John-Mark Gurney , Svatopluk Kraus CC: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [RPI-B] [HEADS UP] DWC OTG TX path optimisation for 11-current References: <55A7D8CE.4020809@selasky.org> <55B23276.8090703@selasky.org> <55B73113.2020308@selasky.org> <55B8AB76.7030603@selasky.org> <55B8B297.1010008@selasky.org> <20150729154516.GH78154@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150729154516.GH78154@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:47:37 -0000 On 07/29/15 17:45, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Just for your information, when I start buildworld, the system >>responds very fast (console, ssh). After about one hour, it starts to >>print the following warnings: Did this happen before r285935 aswell or only after this revision? --HPS