From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 8 15:55: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sentry.granch.ru (sentry.granch.ru [212.20.5.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F7037B594; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 15:54:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shelton@sentry.granch.ru) Received: (from shelton@localhost) by sentry.granch.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA56255; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 05:55:59 +0700 (NOVST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 05:55:59 +0700 (NOVST) Reply-To: "Rashid N. Achilov" Organization: Granch Ltd. From: "Rashid N. Achilov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: IP_DUMMYNET? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A bit strange problem has been occured recently: with 3.4-RELEASE kernel command: ipfw add pipe 1 ... ipfw pipe 1 config bw 9600bit/s delay 100 ms is OK, with latest CVSupped kernel 3.5-STABLE failed with message setsockopt (IP_DUMMYNET_CONFIGURE): Invalid argument Both kernel config files are completely equal. In kernel are IPFIREWALL, IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE, IPFIREWALL_FORWARD, DUMMYNET options -- With Best Regards. Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), Cert. ID: 28514, Granch Ltd. lead engineer e-mail: achilov@granch.ru, tel (383-2) 24-2363 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message