From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  1 15:57:10 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D0616A405
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2007 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru)
Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1FA13C441
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2007 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru)
Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212AA5F6E;
	Thu,  1 Mar 2007 18:32:13 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108])
	by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25315DDF;
	Thu,  1 Mar 2007 18:32:12 +0300 (MSK)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) id l21FTg2O027477;
	Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:29:42 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:29:42 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru>
Message-ID: <20070301152942.GA27336@rambler-co.ru>
References: <2110071423.20070301151729@citrin.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2110071423.20070301151729@citrin.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: is setsockopt SO_NOSIGPIPE work?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:57:10 -0000


--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Anton,

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:17:29PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello.
>=20
> Is SO_NOSIGPIPE work?
>=20
> It try to set on socket option SO_NOSIGPIPE but anyway process
> received sigpipe.
>=20
It works, but only if you use send() instead of write().
Alternatively, you can control the behavior on a per
message basis, by passing the MSG_NOSIGNAL in the "flags"
argument to the send() call (without having to set a
socket option).


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFF5vFmqRfpzJluFF4RAqvzAJ4wrnjeCo1hcSgl4iQA95sMa1aSYwCeJndi
JbDSkxbHqzViAfULxJFzzP0=
=nPbM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--