Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:15:20 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea for additional feature for jail - jailed security level Message-ID: <74643.988226120@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:04:59 PDT." <200104251904.f3PJ4xP41049@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200104251904.f3PJ4xP41049@earth.backplane.com>, Matt Dillon writes: > I just had an idea... allow the kernel security level to be specified > for a jailed environment. Add a 'securelevel' field to the jail > structure and bump the API rev. That would be trivial to do, but I thought that securelevels were demed "nice proof of concept but not the right way" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74643.988226120>