From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 13 07:59:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587BEDAE
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:59:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4CDA5E
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:59:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8D7xCOx031630
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:59:12 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193574] [NEW PORT] - jadm
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:59:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: nikolay@dachev.info
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-193574-13-3hpBhr3TPL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193574-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193574-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:59:12 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193574

--- Comment #6 from Nikolay Dachev <nikolay@dachev.info> ---
O! sorry i was not understand your early replay on first place.
Now everything make a sense.

tabulate is mts license so i guess it will not be a issue to create freebsd
port,  but ipaddress is under PFS which is not clean for third party software

ref: https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq

i will contact the owner for approval if i can create a freebds ports.

Regards,
Nikolay

(In reply to Vanilla I. Shu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 147262 [details]
> vanilla modified.
> 
> No...
> 
> 
> jadm depends on ipaddress/netifaces/paramiko/tabulate,
> 
> netifaces/paramiko are available on ports tree, so you can use it directly.
> 
> but ipaddress/tabulate are not available on ports tree, you should
> create/submit 2 new ports of them.
> 
> --
> maybe you can use my version as base.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.