From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 08:15:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DCF1065673; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D658FC13; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.170.20.44] (nat-170-142-177-44.tn.gov [170.142.177.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o448F320080503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 May 2010 04:15:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4BDFD774.80908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 03:14:44 -0500 From: Robert Noland Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090218) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <20100430183522.GD64008@bsdcrew.de> <20100503061344.GA98887@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4BDEE40F.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <20100503215027.GA52686@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4BDFB7BF.9080600@FreeBSD.org> <20100504063701.GD52686@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20100504063701.GD52686@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Xorg 7.5 merge comming tomorrow. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 08:15:08 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-May-04 00:59:27 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: >> Hrm, do bad things happen before a pixel crosses vertical 2048? > > I only have 1024 vertical px. As far as I can tell, in a side-by-side > configuration, the problems start as soon as I write pixels onto the > RH window. I will do so more careful checks and see if there's any > region on the left side of the RH display that is OK. > >> It >> looks like you have 2 1280x1024 displays and a virtual framebuffer 2560 >> pixels wide. > > That's the normal configuration. I have also tried stacking > vertically (so I have a 1280x2048 VFB). In this case, the top ~1/4 of > the lower screen is OK (and a slightly smaller region at the bottom > also appears OK) and the rest is corrupt. I've tried increasing the > VFB size (via a "Screen" Virtual directive) to no avail. > >> I'm wondering if the issue occurs as soon as the window >> starts onto the second display, or if it has to go past 2048 before the >> problem appears. > > Definitely not related to 2048 horizontal px. > > There is a screenshot (from the xorg7.5 test patchset but it looks > the same) in http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27805 Ok, not sure what else to suggest, other than I will try to reproduce it... I know I said that before, but my list of stuff to do is approaching infinity... Good news is that I do have an x600 around here, I just have to find it... robert.