From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 22:50:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB02EB83 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639F491E for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:50:58 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/auYssSp3lvHv2GCTMw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from britannica.bec.de (ip-2-207-170-18.web.vodafone.de [2.207.170.18]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.13 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 505c00qALMoR7qZ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:50:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:50:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:50:26 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: send-pr must live Message-ID: <20141121225026.GA27717@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <11d24756184c5b6f3339f6e645957f86@ultimatedns.net> <546FBF60.70506@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:50:58 -0000 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:44:33PM -0800, NGie Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Darren Pilgrim > wrote: > > On 11/20/2014 10:09 AM, Chris H wrote: > >> > >> As to it having been shell based. While there's nothing wrong with > >> that at all, in fact it's advantageous in many respects. I was toying > >> with the idea of perhaps converting (augmenting) it to being Perl > >> based, by way of a statically linked mini-perl interpreter. I thought > >> it would better *empower* it, also providing for a more "user friendly" > >> dialog. But, like I said; just *toying* with the idea. :) > > > > You can use any language you like; but you'll need to use Bourne if you want > > it in base. > > ... or C/C++. awk? sed? Joerg