From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 15 10:38:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E07A106564A for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B280C8FC08 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so4532037bwz.13 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 03:38:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=cky1y44DaNLoPXcAfLdljMuQMZ++aHAtftPJqeRT0CY=; b=AXjk6/EAIAFN1qdVRf0uucqeLRnSi8uQ1KTHNQyosRGILfBnUHjAkcxHkp0mJ+DRQ/ ulhog2wcKv5BMvmcxMbl4KuxkbABEpkJJqIIxEGf9A3KtRj898v3vQqLvMccpyjWZAyf O/daAkteHXntcl5JWVmdb9jFzgekGW8oGP1lo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=JTloOxG2ceVboB1q/BCPcHbOGYxPq7TTAxV4rdV1mL1+q9kMu0JuuN1dGV8ay2QD0u DEsUQyV9yfWWGYw9VF8xHnVr+2xH07YvQF0HBrz28SE5GGLq/ugF7Ws2XTl8a7RyHYq2 NOp8HbV8hOA6Gb5dbq/4af4lCHP2k8y6OFHt4= Received: by 10.204.83.7 with SMTP id d7mr2849519bkl.206.1305455926225; Sun, 15 May 2011 03:38:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.65.198 with HTTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 03:38:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 11:38:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Mailscanner update -- changes to the port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 10:38:48 -0000 Hi all, I've just finished working on the update for MailScanner, and I've changed a few things that have annoyed me loads-- perhaps it's been irritating for you too! I've removed the extra targets for initial configuration etc, and moved them into a pkg-install script, which means that it also does the Right Thing when being installed from packages; no more messing about doing manual moves of the million .sample files installed! Since I know loads of people rely on this port, please would people try this out and let me know of any issues? Patch at [1] and shar at [2]. Before people ask why I haven't done the usual method of putting lines in pkg-plist for config files, take a look at how many there are... TIA, Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mailscanner-4.83.5.patch [2] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mailscanner-4.83.5.shar