From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 14:38:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4713737B401 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CD943F93 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54LcNwk019522; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54LcNK2002278; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h54LcNf0002277; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:38:23 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Mark Murray Message-ID: <20030604213823.GB2050@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030604211052.GA2050@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <200306042126.h54LQxHh008013@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306042126.h54LQxHh008013@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 21:38:29 -0000 On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar writes: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:42:50PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > I propose to 'cvs rm' the 'base' telnet, and build base telnet by > > > not defining the appropriate macros. > > > > [snip] > > > > > The downside is that base telnet will depend on src/crypto/telnet, > > > so folks in dodgy countries which don't allow them to have crypto > > > source will not be able to do telnet development, and they will > > > not get a "fresh" telnet[d] after a make world. > > > > I think it's a good idea. Do you know how many (which?) dodgy countries > > there are on this particular rock we call the earth? I mean, WRT to this > > particular issue of course :-) > > The only one that I can think of that makes public domain crypto > illegal is Myanmar/Burma, and this is because owning a computer > is illegal. :-) It looks to me that we can remove the base telnet. I'm game. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net