From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 12 17:19: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6E537B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F06343E72; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spadger@best.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55400D7; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:18:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: CAM-ATAPI status? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_915219238P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:18:42 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020813001842.55400D7@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_915219238P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What's the status of the CAM/ATAPI integration? Is anyone thinking of = working on it? When last mentioned, it was mooted that some work needed to be done to = tidy things up. Since then, it's gone very quiet - specifically, I don't = seem to recall seeing any specifics about what needed to be cleaned up. Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I = suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches = locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact = that FreeBSD doesn't let them use cdrecord with ATAPI CD-Rs.... Whilst I appreciate the need for coding standards and good-quality code, = (and indeed this is a large part of my personal reasons for choosing = this OS), it seems to me that this has kind of slipped through the = cracks. I've been using the CAM/ATAPI patches on -STABLE for some time now, and = it Just Works - I've burned quite a lot of CD-R's and CD-RW's with my = internal laptop drive and the latest 'cdrecord' from ports, and neither = this nor anything else on the machine appears to suffer unduly. What I'd *really* like to see is for the CAM/ATAPI stuff to go into 4.7 = - it seems to me that people choose the OS for stability, performance = and, let's not forget, *features*, what you can actually /do/ with the = machine. Regards, AS --==_Exmh_915219238P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE9WFBiPHh895bDXeQRAuISAKC9IfvsXAWVb/ysJrAbuRooGui03ACgiS9r cDRoKTOUmcGueXJ9d50Mm18= =4PL9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_915219238P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message