Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:29:54 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r389117 - head/databases/db48 Message-ID: <55788222.2090909@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201506101808.t5AI8akA072276@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201506101808.t5AI8akA072276@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/10/2015 20:08, Matthias Andree wrote: > Author: mandree > Date: Wed Jun 10 18:08:35 2015 > New Revision: 389117 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/389117 > > Log: > Bump expiration date. > > Modified: > head/databases/db48/Makefile > > Modified: head/databases/db48/Makefile > ============================================================================== > --- head/databases/db48/Makefile Wed Jun 10 18:03:50 2015 (r389116) > +++ head/databases/db48/Makefile Wed Jun 10 18:08:35 2015 (r389117) > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ COMMENT= The Berkeley DB package, revisi > DEPRECATED= Please migrate to db5 or db6 > # The port is not to be removed unless the bitcoin-related ports can > # go without this. > -EXPIRATION_DATE= 2015-05-31 > +EXPIRATION_DATE= 2015-07-31 > As a ramification, can you set DEPRECATED and EXPIRATION_DATE=2015-07-31 for all the bitcoin-related ports that refuse to transition off of db48? This port expiration has been extended several times, so why would these bitcoin ports feel the need to change? The maintainers know it will just get extended again. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55788222.2090909>