From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 11 00:49:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA7DAA6; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C858FC0A; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [76.124.49.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6270923F645; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:48:57 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Claude Buisson Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots Message-ID: <20121011004857.GL10429@glenbarber.us> References: <50717D35.7040106@affle.com> <1349727367645-5750424.post@n5.nabble.com> <50754E24.4040903@orange.fr> <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <20121010234056.GI10429@glenbarber.us> <50761295.6010209@orange.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50761295.6010209@orange.fr> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:49:00 -0000 --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:28:05AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > >> - the recently created snapshots.glenbarber.us is much more limited > > > > May I ask what it is that is limiting? If there is some limitation, I > > certainly will do what I can to address it. > > > > Right now, the limitations I am already aware of are: > > [...] > You said it, I have nothing to add. >=20 Thank you for clarifying. Hopefully within the next few days, I'll have the stable/8 snapshot building issue fixed.[1] The space issue, right now, is a bit out of my control at the moment. [1] For reference on why the stable/8 snapshots are a problem for me, I am building all snapshots on a single 64-bit machine. The normal magic used by the release build script on -CURRENT does not work out-of-box because additional make(1) flags are required and/or incompatible with the flags for the stable/9 and head/ branches. > > As mentioned in my original email, I certainly do welcome feedback. I > > certainly will do what I can to address any issues and/or limitations. > > >=20 > Do not misinterpret my mail: I really think that your work is useful. No misinterpretation at all. I appreciate the feedback. Glen --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQdhd5AAoJEFJPDDeguUajlsYH/1ma5DQxNOIWg2XnmBj2AFGO B0y+v81XjBfmE0eJ6LiOezXvMiYPwsgCl/VJ2IbOFhY3qWgAcwj2Ef0/eEw7v+xV n6QUEYAe9ApnrhQ6Md379RAVFTLiG4qnSHx6aiAvA+SI0gqydY1DVgNZ9Uy3uPLw TJx3cxMHaAwrxLwMeAEV4uB+XJPAtNOjkJNAihGqEbzwIHMdabMxKf7mUqKo/+98 qfmON1185nECnTkK04KDHgrltANMWOwtbv+L2VQ3sObkLwtYmXG5Ezf+56XCM+Sn Slwah1aBZJUGz3R7bIjlYa687+z8mNF9k98Zx4ZzqmMtLAOoFMxaov/W7SbyG1g= =Z04j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC--