From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 8 11:49:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E3714C5A for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 11:49:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id 72FC69B25; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 14:49:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D17BA1D; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 14:49:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 14:49:27 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: cdf.lists@pawn.primelocation.net To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE + Qt libraries + gcc 2.95 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Will Andrews wrote: > Now, the question here is - is there a way I can ensure that (in the kdevelop > port) the KDE and Qt libraries have been compiled with gcc 2.95? If not, it > seems like we may need to add USE_NEWGCC=yes to the appropriate ports in order > to support ports such as kdevelop. > > Thoughts/comments? > I had to do the same with kmysql. It works fine if gcc2.9x is used, but will not compile under 2.7.2.3. My biggest concern will be the library incompatibility with kde libs compiled with an older g++. Perhaps a version bump may alleviate problems; otherwise, I don't expect the general populice will be too happy with having to recomple *all* kde libs/apps. ----- Chris D. Faulhaber | All the true gurus I've met never System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one, and always Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message