From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 9 22:03:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535B616A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BFB43D31 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j09M38qi045581; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:03:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:03:08 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Avleen Vig In-Reply-To: <20050109202411.GJ69719@silverwraith.com> Message-ID: <20050110010149.P45532@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <41E10BF2.6050101@comcast.net> <20050109121856.GI69719@silverwraith.com> <20050109170419.X38764@mp2.macomnet.net> <20050109202411.GJ69719@silverwraith.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (192/041231) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard (4/030526) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Marking - Keywords (2/030321) X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0124], SpamtestISP/Release cc: Matt cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network trunkin X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:03:26 -0000 On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, 12:24-0800, Avleen Vig wrote: > > > I though there was a netgraph channel bonding node, but I can't > > > remember it's name :( > > > > ng_fec(4) > > Is that a 5.x-ism? The man page, yes. $ locate ng_fec | grep ^/usr/src /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_fec.c /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_fec.h $ uname -r 4.10-STABLE -- Maxim Konovalov