From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 06:29:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C11C2FB for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2598BEC for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:232:36ff:fe5c:3a87]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808E5940142 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:29:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from freedom.alkumuna.eu ([192.168.10.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0N6TfHq094217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:29:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:29:41 +0100 From: Matthieu Volat To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dovecot2-pigeonhole pkgng conflicts Message-Id: <20130123072941.c52b8dd7f6f0f6fcaaf1d001@alkumuna.eu> In-Reply-To: <20130123003929.GF27275@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130122214706.86d8822fe77c9734510b6529@alkumuna.eu> <20130123003929.GF27275@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:29:50 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:39:29 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've migrated a server to pkgng and had some problem with mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that install files in (at least) same docdir as mail/dovecot2. > > > > I saw this is a problem that can occur with pkgng, but did not find any recommandation to workaround this kind of conflict, is there a prefered way? Should I open a PR for the maintainer? > > > > Yes a PR should be sent to the maintainer, a port should not overwrite files > files from other ports, this should be fixed. > > As a workaround you can define > dovecot-pigeonhole_UNSET=DOCS > in you make.conf > > regards, > Bapt Thanks, I've submitted a PR. -- Matthieu Volat