From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 15:04:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC54F106566C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clint@servedomains.com) Received: from loki.servedomains.com (loki.servedomains.com [66.133.105.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E718FC16 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from loki.servedomains.com (mail [192.168.0.60]) by loki.servedomains.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D1B278975; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from mail.servedomains.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loki.servedomains.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5FF278951 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:54 -0700 (MST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:04:54 -0700 From: Clint To: In-Reply-To: References: <2f23773b5165887ac51d19a612bf4c93@servedomains.com> <20111220224814.GA7715@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <5b246a7cf0bceedf39ff5718336b0753@servedomains.com> Message-ID: <91610121f172c87d5095c8ac03ea9837@servedomains.com> X-Sender: clint@servedomains.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV via loki.servedomains.com Subject: Re: igb performance/load udp issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:04:56 -0000 On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:46:46 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > I was fighting with UDP issues before the latest checkin, so you > should > look at THAT version, 2.3.1 in HEAD please. > > Jack > I'm actually running the HEAD version now, but my problems still persist. I did notice that the excessive load is now spread across multiple cores where before it was isolated to one core at a time. This version also doesn't suffer from the horrible performance I experienced with v2.2.5. Thanks, Clint