Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:25:41 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUILD_DEPENDS= RUN_DEPENDS= Message-ID: <E93121AF-8FAD-4848-B3D7-5CC27DC1210E@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4FB1919E.3060700@shatow.net> References: <4FB1919E.3060700@shatow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 14, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a > large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus > destroying any user-supplied depends. Yes. I think this may even be intentional on the part of the various port maintainers, but the notion of user-supplied additional dependencies is interesting. :-) > The use case for wanting to do this is to force devel/ccache to be a > build dependency on all ports, for package building. Or to force in a > particular library along with LDFLAGS into particular ports. This is > achievable by modifying bsd.local.mk, but is not ideal. Why do you need ccache added to the build dependencies to use it? Can't you just change CC/C++? > This goes along with updating all CLFAGS/LDFLAGS to use += instead of =. For most cases, sure, I would agree that CFLAGS/LDFLAGS should use +=. Regards, -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E93121AF-8FAD-4848-B3D7-5CC27DC1210E>