From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 2 16:47:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12420 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 16:47:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12362 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 16:47:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA21896; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:49:54 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:49:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: Charles Quarri cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hesiod support on 2.2 In-Reply-To: <19980402124503.19020@hackerz.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Charles Quarri wrote: > I am curious is anyone has used hesiod in FreeBSD 2.2 and how > much modification needs to be made to the source (if any) needs > to be done to get it working. > I have looked at the source (still have it unpacked), but I didn't do anything much with it. Would be cool if FreeBSD had an option like "MAKE_KERBEROS4" which would build all utilities (w, ps, etc.) with full hesiod support... > I am looking for a central management system like NIS without > the blatant security holes. I have heard that Hesiod can do this. > Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message