From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Feb 28 14:15:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB6437B400; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g1SMFos60742; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:15:50 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g1SMAfg4054047; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:10:41 GMT (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200202282210.g1SMAfg4054047@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Warning and lint(1) fixes. Review please. References: <20020228125739.A34165@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020228125739.A34165@dragon.nuxi.com> ; from "David O'Brien" "Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:57:39 PST." Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:10:41 +0000 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > 'Cos I'm trying to support multiple lints, and fixing them all seems > > a bit unreasonable :-) > > I think dirtying up the code with tons of #ifndef lint is unreasonable. > We have a base lint so that we can change things (ie, modify it). > What lint's are you trying to support? The one in base, lclint from ports and flexelint (a commercial lint). So far. I am not religious about "messing up the code base", but I would like to strike some kind of middle ground. Having lint not barf over #error's is one of the problems I want to avoid. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message